So sánh gtx 650 vs 8800gt

Nếu bạn muốn so sánh hiệu năng của một card đồ họa nào đó với một card đồ họa khác, bạn đã đến đúng trang web cần tìm! Bảng dưới đây sắp xếp các loại card đồ họa vào các cấp bậc hiệu năng từ cao đến thấp. Các loại card cùng một cấp bậc thì có hiệu năng tương đương nhau.

Để tìm 1 card đồ họa nào đó, nhấn Ctrl+F để dùng tính năng tìm kiếm trên trình duyệt của bạn, sau đó gõ tên card đồ họa mà bạn muốn tìm.

Chú thích: Tên card có màu xanh da trời là card rời dùng cho máy tính để bàn (PC), màu xanh lá là card onboard.

Chú ý: các loại card onboard đời thấp của Intel không được liệt kê ở đây, chẳng hạn như Intel(R) 82945G, Intel(R) G41 Express Chipset... Đây là những loại card rất yếu và chỉ có thể chơi được những game nhẹ.

The GeForce 8800 GT 1GB has a GPU core clock speed of 600 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM runs at 900 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 112 Stream Processors, 56 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 650, which has a core clock frequency of 1058 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1250 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 384 SPUs, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 650 should in theory be much better than the GeForce 8800 GT 1GB overall. ()

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 should be a small bit (approximately 1%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 8800 GT 1GB. ()

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 will be quite a bit (more or less 76%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce 8800 GT 1GB, and should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. ()

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768112CUDA cores768112Core clock speed928 MHz600 MHzNumber of transistors2,540 million754 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm65 nmPower consumption (TDP)110 Watt105 WattMaximum GPU temperature105 °C105 °CTexture fill rate59.2 billion/sec33.6 billion/secFloating-point performance1,425 gflops336.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI-E 2.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16Length5.7" (14.5 cm)9" (22.9 cm)Height4.376" (11.1 cm)Single SlotWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin6-pin & 8-pinSLI optionsno data2-way

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MBMemory bus width128 Bit256 BitMemory clock speed5.4 GB/s900 MHzMemory bandwidth86.4 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMIDual Link DVIHDTVMulti monitor support4 Displays+HDMI+no dataHDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536Audio input for HDMIInternalS/PDIF

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)no data128bit3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)Shader Model5.14.0OpenGL4.32.1OpenCL1.21.1Vulkan1.1.126N/ACUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti outperforms 8800 GT by 413% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms 8800 GT by 414% in Passmark.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce 8800 GT. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 49 Mh/s no data Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.26 Gh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.1 kh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 6.51 1.27 Recency 9 October 2012 29 October 2007 Cost $149 $349 Memory bus width 128 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 112 Memory bandwidth 86.4 57.6 Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 105 Watt

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

GeForce 8800 GT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.