Which type of social movement attempts to block social change or to reverse social changes that have already happened?
|
journal article Show
Social Problems Vol. 41, No. 2 (May, 1994) , pp. 277-298 (22 pages) Published By: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.2307/3096934 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3096934 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $51.00 USD. How does it work?
Abstract Social movements are not distinct and self-contained; rather, they grow from and give birth to other movements, work in coalition with other movements, and influence each other indirectly through their effects on the larger cultural and political environment. Building on both political process and collective identity perspectives, this paper uses a case study of the women's movement's impact on U.S. peace movement activity in the 1980s to develop a theory of movement-movement influence. We argue that this influence is shown by: 1) the adoption of feminist ideological frames by the peace movement; 2) the spread of the women's movement's tactical innovations into peace protest; 3) increased presence of women in leadership positions in both the institutionally-oriented and direct action wings of the movement; and 4) the adoption of organizational structures that built on feminist processes designed to avoid hierarchy. Drawing data from both movements at local and national levels, we suggest four mechanisms of transmission between the movements: 1) organizational coalitions; 2) overlapping social movement communities; 3) shared personnel; and 4) broader changes in the external environment. Social movement spillover effects have implications for our understanding of both the continuity and impact of social protest movements. Journal Information Published quarterly for the Society for the Study of Social Problems, Social Problems tackles the most difficult of contemporary society's issues and brings to the fore influential sociological findings and theories enabling readers to gain a better understanding of the complex social environment. Areas covered by the journal include: conflict and social action; crime and juvenile delinquency; drinking, drugs, and addiction; health policy and services; race and ethnicity; and sexual behavior and politics. One of the most respected and widely read professional journals in today's social sciences, Social Problems presents accessible, relevant, and innovative articles that maintain critical perspectives of the highest quality. Publisher Information Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. journal article SOCIAL MOVEMENT AND SOCIAL CHANGE : TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKSociological Bulletin Vol. 26, No. 1 (March 1977) , pp. 38-59 (22 pages) Published By: Sage Publications, Inc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23618292 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $41.50 USD. How does it work?
Journal Information Sociological Bulletin is published thrice a year: January-April, May-August, and September-December. The journal was published biannually from 1952 to 2003, and became a triannual publication from 2004. Copyright (c) Indian Sociological Society, New Delhi. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in scholarly works, no part of this journal may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Indian Sociological Society. As per the provision under section 10(i) of the Constitution of the Indian Sociological Society all life members are entitled to receive a free copy of the Sociological Bulletin at their registered address. Sociological Bulletin carries reports on research conducted both in India and abroad by professional Sociologists and Anthropologists. Over the last five decades, the journal has been advancing the frontiers of knowledge about Indian society and its social institutions and culture, its structure and dynamics of change. It has been contributing to our understanding of other societies as well. The journal meets the needs of higher education in India and provides for specialists and non specialists alike. It also serves as an important source material for University students and researchers. Publisher Information Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which is the type of social movement attempts to prevent or undo change to the social structure?Resistance movements seek to prevent or undo change to the social structure. The Ku Klux Klan and pro-life movements fall into this category.
What are the three types of social movements?Sociologists distinguish between several types of social movement:. Scope: reform movement - movements advocating changing some norms or laws. ... . Type of change: innovation movement - movements which want to introduce or change particular norms, values, etc. ... . Targets: ... . Methods of work: ... . Old and new: ... . Range:. What type of movement seeks to improve society by changing some specific aspect of the social structure?Reform movements seek to change something specific about the social structure. Examples include anti-nuclear groups, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and the National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC). Revolutionary movements seek to completely change every aspect of society.
What are some movements for social change?9 powerful social change movements you need to know about. Black Lives Matter. ... . Schools Strike for Climate. ... . Indigenous land rights movement. ... . Girls' rights to education. ... . Movement against apartheid. ... . #MeToo. ... . Marriage equality.. |
