Exynos 7904 8 nhân 64-bit so sánh với qualcom năm 2024

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 7904 (with Mali-G71 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Single and multi-core processor tests

Gaming Performance

GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan

Battery life

Efficiency of battery consumption

NanoReview Score

Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

• Performs 5.8x better in floating-point computations
• Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 14 nm)
• Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 10 score – 310K vs 139K
• Announced 2-years and 9-months later
• Higher GPU frequency (~45%)
• 33% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 1800 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios

CPU 54333 106113 GPU 21320 47575 Memory 37868 87495 UX 27097 69877 Total score 139895 310580

Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Asset compression 59.7 MB/sec 90 MB/sec HTML 5 Browser 29.1 pages/sec 46.2 pages/sec PDF Renderer 38.6 Mpixels/sec 64.4 Mpixels/sec Image detection 11.2 images/sec 16.3 images/sec HDR 36.2 Mpixels/sec 51.6 Mpixels/sec Background blur 1.51 images/sec 3.06 images/sec Photo processing 7.05 images/sec 11.7 images/sec Ray tracing 1.73 Mpixels/sec 2.52 Mpixels/sec

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Stability 97% 90% Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS Score 407 441

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games

PUBG Mobile - 59 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS [Low] Fortnite - 23 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends - 65 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz - 62 FPS [Medium] Genshin Impact - 26 FPS [Low] Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 54 FPS [Ultra] Device - Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 1080 x 2400

We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 7904 and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) Cores 8 8 Frequency 1800 MHz 2400 MHz Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A Process 14 nanometers 6 nanometers Transistor count 2 billion - TDP 5 W - Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G71 MP2 Adreno 610 Architecture Bifrost 1st gen Adreno 600 GPU frequency 770 MHz 1114 MHz Execution units 2 1 Shading units 16 128 Total shaders 32 128 FLOPS 49.3 Gigaflops 284 Gigaflops Vulkan version 1.3 1.1 OpenCL version 2.0 2.0 DirectX version - 12.1

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency - 2133 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s Max size 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No Hexagon 686 Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 2520 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X11 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 13 5G support No No Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth 5.0 5.1 Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?

Snapdragon 680

65 (82.3%)

Total votes: 79

Related Comparisons

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Exynos 7904, or ask any questions